Soumitra Dutta says that "today's leaders must embrace social media because they provide a low-cost platform on which to build your personal brand, they allow you to engage rapidly and simultaneously with peers, employees, customers, etc. and they give you an opportunity to learn from instant information and unvarnished feedback". In public relations and as strategic communicators we need to be able to produce something that is unique and unexpected because that is what stands out and captures the attention of key people. Of these key people is what Allocca describes as "tastemakers". These are people that introduce us to new and interesting things and bring them to a larger audience and begin spreading the virus. This can be an employee that feels completely informed and appreciated in her company because of a company blog or a celebrity who enjoys a unique and interesting video on YouTube and decides to show it on his national show as Jimmy Kimmell did with the double rainbow video (now you want to run and see what I'm talking about, correct?). A beautiful example of an idea going viral and producing something beautiful is Eric Whitacre's virtual choir. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7o7BrlbaDs
On the other hand, we need to be on top of what is going on in our social media world and have an open forum where our community feels welcome to make suggestions, comments, and offer insight. These platforms "allow companies to collect information about their fans, gather rich insight, and encourage micro-communities and loyalty-driving conversations". Organizations need to have a plan in place in case videos go viral that portray their company and/or staff members in a negative light. One plan is to have trained and intelligent staff from all departments handling the comprehensive online communications for the company. Having a strong internal corporate base as aforementioned provides a strong beginning point when dealing with criticism. This also keeps turnover down by being aware of our potential new hires and their credibility and integrity. How will they represent our company?
Nestle is a good example of the wrong way to handle negative feedback. In 2010 they were Greenpeace attacked them for getting palm oil from a company that was "illegally deforesting the rainforests of Indonesia". Instead of being compassionate and effectively listening to the comments, they retaliated with sarcastic remarks and censoring critics and removing posts that furthered the outrage. When the values of others are threatened, the effectiveness of our company "why" and its integrity are in jeopardy and the virus can become fatal. In 2011, Southwest Airlines had a near disaster when the roof of one of the flights ripped open warranting an emergency landing. Southwest was proactive with their Facebook page and allowed the conversation to take its natural course and responded honestly and kept the followers up-to-date on what they were doing to remedy the situation. This served them well.

As you stated, the word "virus" stirs up negative connotations. Our immediate response when hearing the word is caution and varying levels of alarm. Naturally, we become defensive. We can, as you point out, use social media to change a negative into a positive; something "bad" into something "good". A computer virus is a program that replicates itself and spreads from computer to computer. Sounds very similar to social media. It is powerful. My Bible speaks of the power of the tongue (speech, expression). Like the proverbial two-edged sword, social media can be used to destroy or defend with immediate results. Good or bad; desired or not. I like your "RCMT" virus. Kilroy said, "Where the road forks, choose wisely." You did.
ReplyDelete